Board index

Sport Pilot Talk

The discussion forum for Sport Pilots and Light Sport Aircraft
* * * CHECK Out the Sport Pilot Talk Flight School and Rental Finder Map! * * * It is currently Wed Oct 22, 2014 5:19 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Zodiac 601 vs. 650
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 8:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 131
Location: North Carolina, USA
Are there any real discernible differences between the Zodiac 601 XL and the 650? I'm alittle concern that the 650 may actually have less baggage area in the rear than the 601 XL.

Thoughts?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:40 pm
Posts: 294
The bulkhead that defines the back of the baggage area is about 10 inch farther forward in the 650 that the 601. However the baggage area is higher in the 650. From a volume stand point it may be a wash. You won't get skis in either.

I'm a kit builder and have both sets of plans if you have any other questions.

Ron


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 30, 2011 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 131
Location: North Carolina, USA
rsteele wrote:
The bulkhead that defines the back of the baggage area is about 10 inch farther forward in the 650 that the 601. However the baggage area is higher in the 650. From a volume stand point it may be a wash. You won't get skis in either.

I'm a kit builder and have both sets of plans if you have any other questions.

Ron


Well I'm not looking to get skis in there, just either a duffel bag, or some camping equipment. The 601 seem to have better baggage area for the camping gear than the 650.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 3:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:40 pm
Posts: 294
NCPilot wrote:
rsteele wrote:
The bulkhead that defines the back of the baggage area is about 10 inch farther forward in the 650 that the 601. However the baggage area is higher in the 650. From a volume stand point it may be a wash. You won't get skis in either.

I'm a kit builder and have both sets of plans if you have any other questions.

Ron


Well I'm not looking to get skis in there, just either a duffel bag, or some camping equipment. The 601 seem to have better baggage area for the camping gear than the 650.


I'm not so sure. The baggage space in the 601 is much lower. I probably really depends on what you are packing.

If camping is your thing, the 750 might fit your needs better. It has a lot more cargo space and is of course designed for off field use. It's going to be slower in cruise.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 4:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:09 pm
Posts: 131
Location: North Carolina, USA
rsteele wrote:
NCPilot wrote:
rsteele wrote:
The bulkhead that defines the back of the baggage area is about 10 inch farther forward in the 650 that the 601. However the baggage area is higher in the 650. From a volume stand point it may be a wash. You won't get skis in either.

I'm a kit builder and have both sets of plans if you have any other questions.

Ron


Well I'm not looking to get skis in there, just either a duffel bag, or some camping equipment. The 601 seem to have better baggage area for the camping gear than the 650.


I'm not so sure. The baggage space in the 601 is much lower. I probably really depends on what you are packing.

If camping is your thing, the 750 might fit your needs better. It has a lot more cargo space and is of course designed for off field use. It's going to be slower in cruise.


Eh I'm not really a high wing kinda guy. All of the aircraft I've flown are low wings, that's what I'm used to.

Any Utility aircraft that has low wings? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 31, 2011 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Posts: 3958
Location: Lock Haven PA
I'm given to believe that both the 601 and the 650 can be built with wing lockers. You'll still be weight limited, of course, but that should give you room for lots of camping gear.

_________________
The opinions expressed in this post are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the position of the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof. H. Paul Shuch, Ph.D., CFII, LSRM-A/GL/WS
AvSport of Lock Haven
http://AvSport.org fly@AvSport.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 01, 2011 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:40 pm
Posts: 294
drseti wrote:
I'm given to believe that both the 601 and the 650 can be built with wing lockers. You'll still be weight limited, of course, but that should give you room for lots of camping gear.


Wing lockers are quite common. They aren't large, about 8 inches deep and about 20 inches square. Certainly a help. Especially for things like tie downs, extra oil or some beverages to enjoy at the end of your flight. They are not weather tight however. If it rains anything in there will be wet.

Ron


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:44 pm
Posts: 234
Location: Garner, NC (nc99 via airnav)
could you not add some weather stripping to the inside and make them mostly weather proof?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 31, 2011 9:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 4:40 pm
Posts: 294
weather stripping might help, but would be difficult to install so that it was both effective and not change the profile of the lid. It's also possible for water to enter at seams and migrate around inside the wing. If you need something dry put into big plastic bag.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 01, 2012 1:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 15, 2011 11:44 pm
Posts: 234
Location: Garner, NC (nc99 via airnav)
That makes a lot of sense -- admittedly I'm about to go look at one of these (601XL) in the next week or so, so any and all information that anybody can provide would be greatly appreciated!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Archive

[ Time : 0.066s | 16 Queries | GZIP : Off ]