Board index

Sport Pilot Talk

The discussion forum for Sport Pilots and Light Sport Aircraft
* * * CHECK Out the Sport Pilot Talk Flight School and Rental Finder Map! * * * It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 11:12 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 4:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:57 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Texas
Here ia an article involving LSA.

http://www.generalaviationnews.com/2011 ... or-patrol/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:38 pm
Posts: 429
Location: Albuquerque, NM
I hope they have the payload reserve for all the cop stuff, so that they can loiter a few hours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 11:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Ca
Several agencies use ppc's for patrol duties, so not really the first sport aircraft. Maybe the first fixed wing s-lsa. With full fuel, the camera system (to most likely include flir), additional radio, and a pair of deputies, that will be pushing 1320+.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 6:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:50 am
Posts: 73
I don't quite understand how these lsa can be used for law enforcement, some with officers that only have sport pilot ratings yet the lsa cannot be used for aerial photography or glider towing.
more of the gov't do as I say...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Ca
From the article, I gathered that the pilot was a PP. Therefore, he/she can still fly as a private pilot would up to the limitations of the aircraft. Also, public use can often lead to fudging the fars....altitude, weight, equipment, and other rules.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 2:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:13 pm
Posts: 514
Location: noble, IL USA
As a government registered vehicle they may be playing under different rules. I don't know how far it trickles down, but some government agencies don't have to follow the CFR's.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Ca
In theory, public use doesn't even require certification. Not a good policy for potential liability, but non the less, not required.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 7:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:57 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Texas
zaitcev wrote:
I hope they have the payload reserve for all the cop stuff, so that they can loiter a few hours.

I just hope they are a little bit trimmer than the Motorcycle Police we see here in Austin. Otherwise they won't have room for fuel.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:00 pm
Posts: 252
This is a good source of info on LSA in law enforcement. www.justnet.org/aviation

A public entity (sheriff's office) does not need a civil airworthiness or civil airman certificiate when flying for a public mission (sheriff's duty). Therefore, an LSA can be used by a law enforcement entity as it is not restricted to the airworthiness cert. Similiarly, the pilot is not restricted to his SP ticket (if that is what he used).

Yes, we have been using LSAs in law enforcement since 2006 (starting with PPC and moving to S-LSA fixed wing). We are now looking at gyroplanes. Given the low cost of acquistion and low cost of operating, it makes a lot more sense than a $12M helicopter for a lot of the missions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:38 pm
Posts: 429
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Are there any missions involving hovering?

And on the other hand, if you just use CTLS as a glorified attachment point for FLIR, why not switch to a UAV?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Posts: 2576
Location: Lock Haven PA
zaitcev wrote:
why not switch to a UAV?


Have you ever flown one? Not nearly as much fun! :wink:

_________________
The opinions expressed in this post are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the position of the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof. H. Paul Shuch, Ph.D., CFII, LSRM-A/GL/WS
AvSport of Lock Haven
http://AvSport.org fly@AvSport.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 8:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:00 pm
Posts: 252
Actually, I fly both. To answer your question about why UAV over manned aircraft would take a while. Basically, due to regulatory issues the UAS are not as practical. Moreover, the cost of a UAV with a camera similar to what we put on the LSAs would cost substantially more than an LSA.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 8:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 6:50 am
Posts: 73
Anything the gov't (local state or fed)can do by any means necessary in order to invade our privacy and confiscate our assets (fines) and to justify their existence. It certainly ain't about public safety or our borders would be secure. Just my 2cents(nonsense)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2011 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2007 7:00 pm
Posts: 252
I think the "invasion of privacy" argument is generally thrown around by media, movies, and the uniformed. Understanding the use of these aircraft and their capabilities would make for a much more informed discussion on privacy rights, etc.

I do find it interesting that people complain about invasion of privacy by law enforcement from the sky but rarely do you hear about the independent pilot. At least law enforcement has restriction on the way they can use pictures/video obtained from the sky. Others can just post it on the internet, sell it for profit or use it to slander someone.

The reality is that the LSA and UAS aircraft used by law enforcement are used to either provide situational awareness during an incident, search and rescue (project lifesaver), or aerial photography of critical infrastructure (schools, prisons, shopping malls, stadiums) to be used for reference in the event of a critical incident.

These aircraft (and the cameras equipped on them) are not (and really aren't that capable) of "spying" on people by taking pictures of their activities in their backyard. From 3,000' the quality of the video can tell there is a person in the backyard and maybe tell if they are black, white, etc. but can't tell any facial features, cloth descriptions or what is in their hand.

I wouldn't discourage law enforcement aviation through LSAs due to fears of invasion of privacy. You could take away a very valuable resource based on wrong assumptions.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:29 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 2:51 pm
Posts: 59
Location: Ca
I was pushing the "ppc for patrol" idea around for awhile, but the wind is always blowing some out here. Then, I migrated to a Challenger II and now on to a Rans S-6. Don't know if it will ever happen, but I'm still looking.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Archive