Piper announces new trainers

Sport aviation is growing rapidly. But the new sport pilot / light-sport aircraft rules are still a mystery to many flight schools and instructors. To locate a flight school offering sport pilot training and/or light-sport aircraft rentals, click on the "Flight School And Rental Finder" tab above. This is a great place to share ideas on learning to fly, flight schools, costs and anything else related to training.

Moderator: drseti

User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Piper announces new trainers

Post by drseti »

Their new Piper 100, just announced at Sun-n-Fun, is essentially a 2-place, VFR Archer. It's priced at $259k, and is being marketed to flight schools.
Piper CEO Simon Caldecott said the new models are designed for smaller flight schools who want new airplanes. He said the training market is “no place for a light sport-derived anything.” Flight schools, he said, wanted an airplane with the durability and reliability of the Piper products, but at a price point affordable to local flight schools.
Let's see, now... twice the price of a well equipped LSA, which is also a 2-place VFR trainer. The guy (and maybe flight schools?) just don't get it.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
Warmi
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Frankfort, IL

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by Warmi »

The only thing going for them is the fact that the plane is certified , runs a legacy engine and is a know bran - and to be honest , it probably handles better with a sturdier gear that doesn’t have to compromise with 1320 lbs limit.
Will that be enough for flight schools - I suspect it will ...
Flying Sting S4 ( N184WA ) out of Illinois
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by drseti »

Another "advantage" of the Archer is that it can be flown onto the runway at just about any speed. So the student need not bother with learning airspeed control or even stabilized approaches. :evil:
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Wm.Ince
Posts: 1080
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 3:27 pm
Location: Clearwater, FL

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by Wm.Ince »

Warmi wrote: . . . Will that be enough for flight schools - I suspect it will ...
It is for UND. They already have a zillion of them. Ordered 2 years ago to replace the C-172.
All well equipped with G-1000.
Bill Ince
LSRI
Retired Heavy Equipment Operator
TimTaylor
Posts: 1594
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:17 pm

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by TimTaylor »

Let's hope it is a success. Diversity is a good thing, even in aviation.
Retired from flying.
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by drseti »

TimTaylor wrote:Diversity is a good thing, even in aviation.
Especially in aviation.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by drseti »

Wm.Ince wrote: Cut the political crap!
I didn't see that as a political statement at all, Bill.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
Warmi
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 5:35 pm
Location: Frankfort, IL

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by Warmi »

Well, I would certainly expect a CEO of a company competing with LSA planes to say that LSAs have no place in training schools ( and probably anywhere else as far as he is concerned ) ... :D
Flying Sting S4 ( N184WA ) out of Illinois
chicagorandy
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 2:39 pm

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by chicagorandy »

I can appreciate that there is a market for new aircraft for Private Pilot flight schools at what some might call "affordable" prices. This new Piper offering may indeed fit that market. Can't say it can do anything for Sport Pilot schools though.

As a wanna-be flyer myself, I am saddened when anyone in the aviation industry bashes another segment of that industry. News flash - if it flies in the skies it's ALL good..... IMHO.....same goes for all industries.
"Don't believe everything you read on the internet" - Abraham Lincoln
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by drseti »

Warmi wrote:Well, I would certainly expect a CEO of a company competing with LSA planes to say that LSAs have no place in training schools ( and probably anywhere else as far as he is concerned ) ... :D
Obviously, this particular CEO doesn't subscribe to the Rising Tides philosophy (lifts all boats).
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by drseti »

chicagorandy wrote: I am saddened when anyone in the aviation industry bashes another segment of that industry.
I share your sadness.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
TimTaylor
Posts: 1594
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:17 pm

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by TimTaylor »

I learned to fly in what would today be considered an LSA if only it didn't have that pesky nose wheel. Got my Private in it also, a Champion Tri-Traveler 7FC.
Retired from flying.
3Dreaming
Posts: 3107
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:13 pm
Location: noble, IL USA

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by 3Dreaming »

TimTaylor wrote:I learned to fly in what would today be considered an LSA if only it didn't have that pesky nose wheel. Got my Private in it also, a Champion Tri-Traveler 7FC.
It wasn't the nose wheel that kept it from being a LSA. The 7FC was based on the 7EC which had a 1450 or 1500 pound gross weight depending on serial number range.
TimTaylor
Posts: 1594
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 7:17 pm

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by TimTaylor »

3Dreaming wrote:
TimTaylor wrote:I learned to fly in what would today be considered an LSA if only it didn't have that pesky nose wheel. Got my Private in it also, a Champion Tri-Traveler 7FC.
It wasn't the nose wheel that kept it from being a LSA. The 7FC was based on the 7EC which had a 1450 or 1500 pound gross weight depending on serial number range.
I was referring to the additional weight versus the LSA eligible aircraft.
Retired from flying.
3Dreaming
Posts: 3107
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:13 pm
Location: noble, IL USA

Re: Piper announces new trainers

Post by 3Dreaming »

TimTaylor wrote:
3Dreaming wrote:
TimTaylor wrote:I learned to fly in what would today be considered an LSA if only it didn't have that pesky nose wheel. Got my Private in it also, a Champion Tri-Traveler 7FC.
It wasn't the nose wheel that kept it from being a LSA. The 7FC was based on the 7EC which had a 1450 or 1500 pound gross weight depending on serial number range.
I was referring to the additional weight versus the LSA eligible aircraft.
While it is true that the ancestry of the 7FC goes back to a LSA eligible airplane the nose wheel is not the reason for it to not be LSA eligible today. The nose wheel was added to a later version of the Champ that was already to heavy by the current LSA definition.
Post Reply