sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Sport aviation is growing rapidly. But the new sport pilot / light-sport aircraft rules are still a mystery to many flight schools and instructors. To locate a flight school offering sport pilot training and/or light-sport aircraft rentals, click on the "Flight School And Rental Finder" tab above. This is a great place to share ideas on learning to fly, flight schools, costs and anything else related to training.

Moderator: drseti

Jack Tyler
Posts: 1380
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Prescott AZ
Contact:

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by Jack Tyler »

"Of the top ten selling SLSA models listed on bydanjohnson.com, four are indeed composite, four are metal, and two are fabric. And, those four composite aircraft rank #1, 7, 8, and 10. A good start, but hardly dominant."

Exactly. And probably the main reason for that diversity in sales success is what we keep emphasizing here: Choose the mission, then choose the a/c. Different buyers have different flying goals. And this sales diversity also reflects the financial side of 'the mission' since different buyers have different amounts of discretionary income and/or funds. Only a small minority of buyers to date have chosen to pay $150K+ for an LSA as, adjusted for inflation, the sales reports have consistently shown since 2005. At this year's Sun 'n Fun, the busiest LSA distributor/USA sales company I saw - by far - was the Aerotrek tube-and-fabric S-LSA, which was being sold well equipped for $87K.

Pull the curtains back further - to include the E-LSA and E-AB marketplace - and the composite slice of the market grows much smaller, for the obvious reason that it's less suitable (skill sets, sometimes more expensive/sophisticated build tools) for owner completion. I haven't checked the certification numbers for E-LSA category, completed RV-12's lately, but that metal model would I believe rank pretty high in the Top Ten if all X-LSA a/c were counted. Add the E-AB RV-12's and that model would likely be near the top.

"In fact, LSA has already seen a half dozen companies fold..."
Far more than that. I believe there are now ~130 S-LSA models which have been approved by the FAA since 2004. How many of those models are currently being built, sold and certified, at least a few every year, in the USA? A pretty small percentage.
Jack
Flying in/out KBZN, Bozeman MT in a Grumman Tiger
Do you fly for recreational purposes? Please visit http://www.theraf.org
David Pavlich
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by David Pavlich »

Of all the S-LSA rules that would aid the LSA market would be to increase the maximum take off weight. Even a modest increase to 1400 lbs would be a huge improvement in the appeal of these otherwise terrific airplanes. One pictured earlier in this thread, the Arion Lightning, empty weight, 820 pounds, would be a much more attractive piece of hardware with a useable weight of 580 pounds than 500.

And something like the Bristell that comes in around 750 lbs empty weight becomes a serious two person cross country craft, bladder capacity not withstanding. :mrgreen:

David
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by drseti »

David Pavlich wrote:Of all the S-LSA rules that would aid the LSA market would be to increase the maximum take off weight.
I don't disagree one bit, David. However, from a practical viewpoint, the FAA has absolutely no incentive to move in this direction. Their mission is to improve safety, not to aid the marketplace. They've already met their safety mission by reigning in the fat ultralights. Mission accomplished, as far as FAA is concerned.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
FlyingForFun
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:41 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by FlyingForFun »

Delete
Last edited by FlyingForFun on Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by drseti »

The FAA's mission is to make rules to improve safety, not merely to not jeopardize it. Unless that we can show (quantitatively) that such a change will decrease the number and severity of accidents, we don't have a case.

As for comparing the relative safety of the C162 vs. the C152, there is a quantifiable difference in kinetic energy to dissipate in the event of an accident, which has relevance to survivability. I'll try to do the research, crunch the numbers, and post my findings here later.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
CTLSi
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:38 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by CTLSi »

......
Last edited by CTLSi on Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by drseti »

CTLSi wrote:The hands-down sales leader is Flight Design and all their models are all carbon fiber.
True, the #1 seller is carbon fiber. The #2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 aren't. So, as I said, it's a good start, but hardly dominant.
Cubcrafters Carbon Cub - again carbon fiber.
The name Carbon Cub is a clever marketing trick. It's a tube and fabric airplane, isn't it? The fact that some of the tubes are carbon is, as I keep saying, a good start.
Dont know what Dan Johnson said or is writing about, but no one questions who the LSA leaders are.
My post has nothing to do with what Dan is saying or writing about. It merely cites the Top Ten statistics that happen to be on his website.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
CTLSi
Posts: 783
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:38 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by CTLSi »

......
Last edited by CTLSi on Mon Dec 01, 2014 10:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
FlyingForFun
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:41 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by FlyingForFun »

Delete
Last edited by FlyingForFun on Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by drseti »

CTLSi wrote:Leader Of The Pack
Good article. Says in one place,
documented 21% lower fuel consumption
Which is consistent with Phil Lockwood's test on the AirCam (which I described in a separate thread). That's far more believable than the 35% fuel reduction some have claimed.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
David Pavlich
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 9:43 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by David Pavlich »

drseti wrote:
David Pavlich wrote:Of all the S-LSA rules that would aid the LSA market would be to increase the maximum take off weight.
I don't disagree one bit, David. However, from a practical viewpoint, the FAA has absolutely no incentive to move in this direction. Their mission is to improve safety, not to aid the marketplace. They've already met their safety mission by reigning in the fat ultralights. Mission accomplished, as far as FAA is concerned.
That's a good point, Paul. Heck, look how long it's been since the petition about changing the medical requirements.

David
newamiga
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by newamiga »

I would disagree with a previous statement about their not being schools that could survive on LSA training only. The school I learned at in Denver had two locations and at its peak six LSA's in the fleet. They wanted you to be a SP. They would and could provide PP training in their LSA's but the school sold itself as LSA and SP. The school merged with a traditional flight school and unfortunately is down to only two LSA's and don't emphasize SP. The chief pilot and the senior CFI's are not huge fans of LSA's. It is unfortunate. I am glad that I got my ticket when this school was in its heyday and I really enjoyed a school that was exclusively LSA and almost exclusively SP.

Carl
Private Pilot and RV-12 Builder
FlyingForFun
Posts: 509
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 8:41 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by FlyingForFun »

Delete
Last edited by FlyingForFun on Sat Oct 12, 2013 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
newamiga
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:21 pm

Re: sport pilot schools vs. traditional flight schools w/ SP

Post by newamiga »

FlyingForFun wrote:But, maybe that means there wasn't enough demand for Sport Pilot/LSA.
That school kept those LSA's flying a ton. When the LSA's initially went into the traditional school they flew quite a bit. It all comes down to what is sold. They are selling PP in non-LSA's. They make more money on the non-LSA's that they buy more cheaply used. I am quite sure it is economics and not a lack of demand. I know of another school in the Springs area that has told me that they get quite a few calls about SP. There is demand.

Carl
Private Pilot and RV-12 Builder
Post Reply