Glad we could help out!
No matter how long you fly, there will still be landings that get your attention. The important thing is to have the skills to save the ones that are not going as planned. And to never bounce more than twice!
Keep up the good work.
Landing SportCruiser
Moderator: drseti
- FastEddieB
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
- Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Re: Landing SportCruiser
I tell my primary students they get one bounce for free. At that point, they have the option of trying to salvage the landing, or going around. If they get a second bounce, it's an automatic go-around. (This is just flight school policy, definitely not in the FARs.) Because you can easily get 180 degrees out of sync with the plane, there's a very good likelihood of a divergent oscillation, causing every additional bounce to be worse than the one before, until you break something.FastEddieB wrote:never bounce more than twice!.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
- CharlieTango
- Posts: 1000
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:04 am
- Location: Mammoth Lakes, California
Re: Landing SportCruiser
never bounce more than twice = automatic go around after 2nd bounce
you are both saying the same thing.
you are both saying the same thing.
Re: Landing SportCruiser
Correct. I was just elaborating.CharlieTango wrote:you are both saying the same thing.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
- FastEddieB
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
- Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Re: Landing SportCruiser
Darn it!!!drseti wrote:Correct. I was just elaborating.CharlieTango wrote:you are both saying the same thing.
I came here for an argument!
Re: Landing SportCruiser
Sorry to disappoint, Eddie. Don't dispair; I'll rise to the occasion some other time.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Re: Landing SportCruiser
Are you guys talking about an actual bounce (as in hard contact with the ground)? Or a balloon (over correcting and going up again)? Or kind of a "ground touch" / light bouce and repeat?
- FastEddieB
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
- Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Re: Landing SportCruiser
I'm talking about getting back in the air after landing either too soon/too fast/too flat, but the exact reason has been discussed elsewhere. The plane seems to "skip" back into the air.
In any event, in a nosewheel airplane, with the CG ahead of the main gear, touching down main wheels first should normally cause a nose down moment - what Cessna used to advertise as "Land-o-Matic". This was seen to make landings easier than tailwheels, where the CG aft of the mains would cause a nose up moment in the same scenario.
So, most bounces come the pilot aggravating the matter a bit, continuing back on the stick after ground contact. There may be some real "bounce" involved as well, since most of the planes we fly have zero damping in the main gear. And we've all probably seen what happens when a plane touches down slightly nosewheel first - the mains drop on, the angle of attack increases, and if there's still flying speed the plane "bounces" back into the air.
YouTube has plenty of bounced landings for your viewing pleasure. Most of the ones that end up with crunched planes have the crunching occur well after one or two bounces as the pilot gets out of phase with what's going on. I'm with the Professor - after one small bounce there may be time to regroup and ease back into a normal landing sequence. But if the plane bounces a second time, it's time to get clear of the ground and rethink things - if you couldn't make a good landing out of a stabilized approach in the first place, your chances of making one while porpoising down the runway becomes vanishingly small, and the odds of bending or breaking something increase dramatically.
In any event, in a nosewheel airplane, with the CG ahead of the main gear, touching down main wheels first should normally cause a nose down moment - what Cessna used to advertise as "Land-o-Matic". This was seen to make landings easier than tailwheels, where the CG aft of the mains would cause a nose up moment in the same scenario.
So, most bounces come the pilot aggravating the matter a bit, continuing back on the stick after ground contact. There may be some real "bounce" involved as well, since most of the planes we fly have zero damping in the main gear. And we've all probably seen what happens when a plane touches down slightly nosewheel first - the mains drop on, the angle of attack increases, and if there's still flying speed the plane "bounces" back into the air.
YouTube has plenty of bounced landings for your viewing pleasure. Most of the ones that end up with crunched planes have the crunching occur well after one or two bounces as the pilot gets out of phase with what's going on. I'm with the Professor - after one small bounce there may be time to regroup and ease back into a normal landing sequence. But if the plane bounces a second time, it's time to get clear of the ground and rethink things - if you couldn't make a good landing out of a stabilized approach in the first place, your chances of making one while porpoising down the runway becomes vanishingly small, and the odds of bending or breaking something increase dramatically.
Re: Landing SportCruiser
Bounce video here:
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x5ZzktAFJK4
Educational video here:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=PGSJruFk ... re=related
http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=x5ZzktAFJK4
Educational video here:
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=PGSJruFk ... re=related
- FastEddieB
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
- Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Re: Landing SportCruiser
Thanks!
In the first, looks like it could have been saved with a go around right up until that FIFTH bounce!
Looks like a tire blew on that one, if not worse!
I've seen that second one before - good one to point every student towards.
In the first, looks like it could have been saved with a go around right up until that FIFTH bounce!
Looks like a tire blew on that one, if not worse!
I've seen that second one before - good one to point every student towards.
- FastEddieB
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
- Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Re: Landing SportCruiser
What's interesting about that video Eddie is that the bounce itself doesn't really look that bad. The plane is not bouncing high off the ground, the suspension is working, but the forces are increasing until the nosewheel finally collapses.