Old school vs new
Moderator: drseti
Re: Old school vs new
Thank you very much. That link was most informative. There's a wealth of information on this site and sometimes it's hard to keep things in perspective. That explained it very nicely.
Re: Old school vs new
......
Last edited by CTLSi on Mon Dec 01, 2014 6:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Old school vs new
See, but this is different. If you design it so that CG is within range with a O-233, then you drop Rotax in easily: just make the motor mount longer! The opposite is much harder.CTLSi wrote:The CH 650's firewall-forward will accommodate a Jabiru 3300, Lycoming O-235 or -233, or Rotax four-cylinder powerplants as alternatives to the S-LSA version's TCM O-200.3Dreaming wrote:Most airplanes with a Rotax would have balance issues with a Lycoming or Continental.