Without visual reference to the surface

The Federal Aviation Regulations (also know as FAR's). This is the Bible of aviation, the rules under which we operate. This is where you'll find everything you want to know about pilots and airplanes in the United States. Ask questions. Get answers.

Moderator: drseti

User avatar
MrMorden
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:28 am
Location: Athens, GA

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by MrMorden »

I had *heard* that a Sport Pilot may not fly above a broken or overcast layer, but that might just be interpretation...I looked for it a few minutes ago in the FARs and could not find specific language to that affect, just the "visual reference to the surface" language. Of course that precludes flying over an overcast, but there are often plenty of gaps in a broken layer to reference the surface.
Andy Walker
Athens, GA
Sport Pilot ASEL, LSRI
2007 Flight Design CTSW E-LSA
3Dreaming
Posts: 3107
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:13 pm
Location: noble, IL USA

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by 3Dreaming »

FastEddieB wrote:That part I think most of us knew*.

It was all that other stuff we were asking for sources on.



*Though, to be honest, I forgot that an instrument rating was required for a Special VFR clearance.
The instrument rating is only required for a Special VFR at night. 91.157, (4), i.
3Dreaming
Posts: 3107
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 6:13 pm
Location: noble, IL USA

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by 3Dreaming »

MrMorden wrote:I had *heard* that a Sport Pilot may not fly above a broken or overcast layer, but that might just be interpretation...I looked for it a few minutes ago in the FARs and could not find specific language to that affect, just the "visual reference to the surface" language. Of course that precludes flying over an overcast, but there are often plenty of gaps in a broken layer to reference the surface.
Andy, overcast is a term used for determining the weather at a specific location. You can be flying over an airport that is overcast while having visual reference to the ground, because an area near by is clear.
User avatar
FastEddieB
Posts: 2880
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by FastEddieB »

3Dreaming wrote:
The instrument rating is only required for a Special VFR at night. 91.157, (4), i.
Thanks for clarifying that. I see the reference now in the quoted text.

I was pretty sure my primary instructor covered Special VFR. And that I had utilized it to get out of Opa Locka on marginal days before I had my Instrument Rating.

Now, a Sport Pilot is still precluded due to the cloud clearances and visibility requirements particular to Sport Pilots.

Correct?
Fast Eddie B.
Sky Arrow 600 E-LSA • N467SA
CFI, CFII, CFIME
[email protected]
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by drseti »

CTLSi wrote:(b) Special VFR operations may only be conducted—
<snip>
(or in Alaska, when the sun is 6 degrees or more below the horizon)...
Yes, that's exactly what the FAR says. I'm sure it's a typo, because it says that, in Alaska, to fly Special VFR, the sun has to be 6 degrees or more below the horizon. I'm sure what they meant is that, in Alaska, for a Special, the sun can't be more than 6 degrees below the horizon.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Jim Stewart
Posts: 467
Joined: Thu Oct 12, 2006 6:49 pm

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by Jim Stewart »

FastEddieB wrote:That part I think most of us knew*.

It was all that other stuff we were asking for sources on.
LOL.
PP-ASEL, Flight Design CTSW owner.
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by drseti »

FastEddieB wrote:Now, a Sport Pilot is still precluded <from Special VFR> due to the cloud clearances and visibility requirements particular to Sport Pilots.

Correct?
That's my understanding, Eddie. And, it probably applies equally to those of us who are Private, Commercial, or Airline Transport pilots flying with lapsed medicals. After all, everybody knows that writing a check to an AME every two years improves our flying skills.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
User avatar
MrMorden
Posts: 2184
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 7:28 am
Location: Athens, GA

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by MrMorden »

3Dreaming wrote:
MrMorden wrote:I had *heard* that a Sport Pilot may not fly above a broken or overcast layer, but that might just be interpretation...I looked for it a few minutes ago in the FARs and could not find specific language to that affect, just the "visual reference to the surface" language. Of course that precludes flying over an overcast, but there are often plenty of gaps in a broken layer to reference the surface.
Andy, overcast is a term used for determining the weather at a specific location. You can be flying over an airport that is overcast while having visual reference to the ground, because an area near by is clear.
Yeah, I mean an overcast of wide enough area that you cannot see the Earth's surface. Though it doesn't matter much, it sounds like there is no prohibition against flying over an overcast as long as you have visual reference to the Earth, even if it's not in your nearby vicinity...
Andy Walker
Athens, GA
Sport Pilot ASEL, LSRI
2007 Flight Design CTSW E-LSA
User avatar
designrs
Posts: 1686
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:57 pm

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by designrs »

These clouds while tempting to get on top as a Sport Pilot "with visual reference to the surface" were actually topped out at 7,000 and pretty solid. Headding Norheast I would have had to have been at the "suggested" VFR altitude of 9,500. Wasn't going to happen.

Look again… these clouds were pretty thick, from about 5,000 to 7,000
brok-IMG_3572.jpg
brok-IMG_3572.jpg (101.46 KiB) Viewed 32181 times
Here's a nice scattered layer at about 4,000.
Nice and easy to fly over…
scat-IMG_3551.jpg
scat-IMG_3551.jpg (85.31 KiB) Viewed 32181 times
Merlinspop
Posts: 999
Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:48 pm
Location: WV Eastern Panhandle

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by Merlinspop »

designrs wrote:Headding Norheast I would have had to have been at the "suggested" VFR altitude of 9,500. Wasn't going to happen.
Um... Not a suggestion, right?
- Bruce
User avatar
designrs
Posts: 1686
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:57 pm

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by designrs »

I always follow VFR altitudes above 3,000 AGL so I'm in compliance anyway. Didn't I read something on this board recently saying VFR altitudes are not required, just "suggested"?
User avatar
drseti
Posts: 7227
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2009 6:42 pm
Location: Lock Haven PA
Contact:

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by drseti »

That was from me, Richard, but I could be mistaken. So, I suggest you comply. :wink:
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
SportPilot
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:39 pm

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by SportPilot »

.......
Last edited by SportPilot on Wed Oct 22, 2014 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
designrs
Posts: 1686
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:57 pm

Re: Without visual reference to the surface

Post by designrs »

Thanks for the catch and clarification.
Post Reply