Renewing the A & P

H. Paul Shuch is a Light Sport Repairman with Maintenance ratings for airplanes, gliders, weight shift control, and powered parachutes, as well as an independent Rotax Maintenance Technician at the Heavy Maintenance level. He holds a PhD in Air Transportation Engineering from the University of California, and serves as Director of Maintenance for AvSport of Lock Haven.

Moderator: drseti

Post Reply
roger lee
Posts: 809
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2009 11:47 am
Location: Tucson, Az. Ryan Airfield (KRYN)

Renewing the A & P

Post by roger lee »

Got to love the FAA!


But FAA Employees Are Apparently Exempt

The FAA has issued a policy which is intended to clarify the definition of "Actively Engaged" for purposes of issuing and renewing the A & P Inspector Authorization. "Actively engaged" means exercising the privileges of an airframe and powerplant mechanic certificate in the maintenance of civil aircraft. Applicants who are employed full-time in inspecting, overhauling, repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft are considered to be actively engaged.

Applicants who are employed or participate in inspecting, overhauling, repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft on a part-time or occasional basis will be evaluated by the ASI to determine whether the applicant is actively engaged. The ASI will evaluate the scope of part-time or occasional activity based on the type of maintenance activity, including any special expertise required, and the quantity of maintenance activity performed. To evaluate the scope of the part-time or occasional maintenance activity, the ASI will use evidence or documentation provided by the applicant showing inspection, overhauling, repairing, preserving, or replacing parts on aircraft.

The AEA has issued a statement saying it is "disappointed" with the initiative.

"For decades, the FAA, as well as industry, has been frustrated by the lack of career recognition of the Airframe and Powerplant mechanic. And now, the FAA proposes to remove this recognition from those who are in senior management positions with corporate flight departments, repair stations and air carriers who are not exercising their A & P privileges to "inspect, overhaul, repair, preserve, or replace parts on aircraft," the statement reads. "In an unprecedented addition, the FAA, while minimizing the recognition of publicly employed A & P mechanics, has exempted its own employees from this flawed policy.

"According to this proposal, because other FAA policy limits the type of maintenance that ASIs can perform (they may only exercise their IA on their personal, non-commercial aircraft), the FAA employees are exempt from this new policy, and "an ASI may renew an IA regardless of volume of maintenance work performed."

AEA encourages every member who may be affected by this policy to send comments to the FAA. Comments on docket number FAA-2010-1060 are due on or before December 6th
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
User avatar
seaplane_tux
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:16 pm
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest

Or just ....

Post by seaplane_tux »

The FAA has been playing this game for a while. Either you show that you have been an active mechanic as in the above statement or...
You show up to 8 hours of IA renewal classes each year.
That little piece of paper replaces 2000 hours of daily experience one gets on the job each year.

I missed one of the local FSDO's classes one year and they held my IA card for about three days just to intimidate me.
Klaus

Arlington, Washington
Post Reply