The exhaust wrap company recommends a spray application to seal the material from oils etc. I'm not fond of the idea due to overspray issues.
Roger have you ever sealed the exhaust wrap with anything?
Thoughts?
Fuel pressure, sensor
Moderator: drseti
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
First post.
Don't worry about the sealing spray on the wrap. Most don't bother with it and it'll be just fine.
Fuel issues like they are discussing has had leaking supply hose. It sucks in air.
Don't worry about the sealing spray on the wrap. Most don't bother with it and it'll be just fine.
Fuel issues like they are discussing has had leaking supply hose. It sucks in air.
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
Roger, at what point would a leaking supply line typically be?
Are you talking before the gascolator?
Or anywhere before the fuel pump?
I assume that you would be referring to a loose clamp around the fitting?
Are you talking before the gascolator?
Or anywhere before the fuel pump?
I assume that you would be referring to a loose clamp around the fitting?
- Richard
Sport Pilot / Ground Instructor
Previous Owner: 2011 SportCruiser
Sport Pilot / Ground Instructor
Previous Owner: 2011 SportCruiser
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
Check all clamps on the supply side. I wouldn't bother with the one at the wing or tank. If that wasn't tight you would have a fuel leak.
Have you ever tried a different pump?
Have you ever tried a different pump?
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
Thanks will do.
I'm also thinking possibly the return line might be a factor.
What's the purpose of the fuel return line?
Is it really for safety or just excessive liability fears?
Some Rotax aircraft don't have the return line, and some are even running the newer fuel pumps.
Some feel the return is necessary for safety.
Others wouldn't feel safe flying with the return.
I've heard of some experimentals installing a restrictor jet on the return line.
Comments?
I'm also thinking possibly the return line might be a factor.
What's the purpose of the fuel return line?
Is it really for safety or just excessive liability fears?
Some Rotax aircraft don't have the return line, and some are even running the newer fuel pumps.
Some feel the return is necessary for safety.
Others wouldn't feel safe flying with the return.
I've heard of some experimentals installing a restrictor jet on the return line.
Comments?
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
The return line is generally used on all Rotax installations that include both a mechanical and an electric fuel pump. When (during takeoff, for example) both fuel pumps are operating simultaneously, they can deliver fuel in excess of that required by the carburetors. In order to prevent overflowing of the carb float bowls, the return line routes the excess fuel back to a fuel tank.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
Alright... good point.
Per my POH normal fuel pressure is 2.2 to 5.8 psi.
Recently I was rapid descending at 3,500 RPM's.
The Dynon indicated fuel pressure at 5.0 psi.
The plane was significantly pitched down.
If excess fuel flowed out of the carbs and into the catch pans with drainhose under the carbs, maybe the attitude would have caused fuel spillage.
So maybe the fuel return line is a good thing in that circumstance?
Yet I seem to recall some Rotax owners seeing fuel pressure as high as 7 psi?
Per my POH normal fuel pressure is 2.2 to 5.8 psi.
Recently I was rapid descending at 3,500 RPM's.
The Dynon indicated fuel pressure at 5.0 psi.
The plane was significantly pitched down.
If excess fuel flowed out of the carbs and into the catch pans with drainhose under the carbs, maybe the attitude would have caused fuel spillage.
So maybe the fuel return line is a good thing in that circumstance?
Yet I seem to recall some Rotax owners seeing fuel pressure as high as 7 psi?
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
The fuel return line also helps to prevent vapor lock. There IS a restrictor in this line, in order to maintain fuel pressure at the carbs. The theory is, circulating fuel back to the tank keeps the contents of the fuel lines in the engine compartment cooler, and any vapor bubbles that do form will go back to the tank through the return line. The fuel pump is designed to operate on liquid, not vapor.
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
When Rotax changed from the AC to the Corona mechanical fuel pump, the changed their maximim fuel pressure specification. Your AOI might not reflect this change.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
Will check the supply side clamps.roger lee wrote:Check all clamps on the supply side. I wouldn't bother with the one at the wing or tank. If that wasn't tight you would have a fuel leak.
Have you ever tried a different pump?
Also have the 15 psi Kavlico sender to install.
I did put a mechanical fuel pressure gauge on T-connected to check.
Was hoping for a low pressure warning from Dynon... unfortunately didn't happen.
Mechanical gauge consistently showed 1 psi over VDO / Dynon.
VDO gauge is 30 psi.
New Kavlico is 15 psi.
I'm hoping that the new sender will have better accuracy indicate higher pressures.
If that doesn't work I guess I must look at pump and rubber.
Fuel pump is new style installed less than a year ago.
It is my impression that when fuel pumps fail they fail totally?
Last edited by designrs on Wed Oct 14, 2015 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
The correct VDO sender should be 0-30 psi. The correct VDO sender is 360-043. The senders are notorious for being off a couple of psi.
This may be the problem with a higher psi sender. The new sender may solve your problem. I would wait until you put the new sender in before you do anything else. That will at least rule a sender error in or out.
This may be the problem with a higher psi sender. The new sender may solve your problem. I would wait until you put the new sender in before you do anything else. That will at least rule a sender error in or out.
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
I have also seen on oil pressure where the wrong sender was selected in the Dynon.
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
The new Kavlico senders require a firmwear update, 5.4.2 or higher. (done).
Instructions say fuel pressure sender is type 6.
Instructions say fuel pressure sender is type 6.
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
And make sure your D120 fuel pressure Max is reset to 7.2 psi.
The electric pump should not add more than .5-1.0 psi more than the mechanical. It was not always this way, but it is now. The recirculation line helps prevent vapor lock and keeps cool fuel circulating. You absolutely need one with the new pump. It will also help control pressure fluctuations. Over heated fuel hose can and will cause hiccups with vapor at times depending on the engine setup and installation.
The electric pump should not add more than .5-1.0 psi more than the mechanical. It was not always this way, but it is now. The recirculation line helps prevent vapor lock and keeps cool fuel circulating. You absolutely need one with the new pump. It will also help control pressure fluctuations. Over heated fuel hose can and will cause hiccups with vapor at times depending on the engine setup and installation.
Roger Lee
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Tucson, Az.
LSRM-A, Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
(520) 574-1080 (Home) Try Home First.
(520) 349-7056 (Cell)
Re: Fuel pressure, sensor
The fuel pressure saga continues:
Recap:
Original VDO sender: occasional fuel pressure warnings, becoming more frequent.
New VDO sender: same as above
Mechanical check gauge: consistently showed 1 psi over VDO
New Kavlico sender (15 psi):
1) consistently shows about .5 psi over VDO
2) fuel pressure fluctuates at cruse 3.4 to 4.4, in 10 to 15 second intervals... apparently a more sensitive sender.
3) turning the electric pump on at cruise causes more rapid pressure fluctuation... but no low pressure warnings yet.
** 4) ON FINAL / Power to idle / boost pump on: low pressure warning, pressures very rapidly fluctuating between 1.7 psi and 4+ psi.
What next? (sigh)
Recap:
Original VDO sender: occasional fuel pressure warnings, becoming more frequent.
New VDO sender: same as above
Mechanical check gauge: consistently showed 1 psi over VDO
New Kavlico sender (15 psi):
1) consistently shows about .5 psi over VDO
2) fuel pressure fluctuates at cruse 3.4 to 4.4, in 10 to 15 second intervals... apparently a more sensitive sender.
3) turning the electric pump on at cruise causes more rapid pressure fluctuation... but no low pressure warnings yet.
** 4) ON FINAL / Power to idle / boost pump on: low pressure warning, pressures very rapidly fluctuating between 1.7 psi and 4+ psi.
What next? (sigh)