FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
Moderator: drseti
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:52 am
FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
225-TTAE, Fresh Conditional Inspection with Sale, Complete Logs, Hangared at N26 in NC, Upgraded VIKING Liquid Cooled, Fuel-Injected, 110-HP Engine Which Includes Flywheel Replacement, ECU (Processor) Software Update, Spider Drive for Gearbox, Idle Pulley for Alternator. Sensenich Ground Adjustable Composite Prop, Dynon SkyView EFIS Featuring GPS, 2-Axis Autopilot, Transponder & Engine Monitoring. Electric Trim, 406-ELT, Intercom, Garmin SL40 Com, Wheel Pants, LED Pulse Lights, Auto Gas or 100LL, Build Manuals (Included), Excellent Paint & Interior, 1320 lbs GW, 760 lbs EW, 20 Gallons Fuel. Asking $66,000 USD OBO. Call or Text Bob Crosby for more photos: 704-905-4931, [email protected].
- Attachments
-
- RV_EXT7.jpg (216.11 KiB) Viewed 27589 times
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
Given the choice of engine, I'm assuming the plane was built as an E-AB, not an ELSA? (It makes a big difference in terms of marketability.)
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
How so?drseti wrote: . . . I'm assuming the plane was built as an E-AB, not an ELSA? (It makes a big difference in terms of marketability.)
Bill Ince
LSRI
Retired Heavy Equipment Operator
LSRI
Retired Heavy Equipment Operator
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
To receive an airworthiness certificate as an ELSA, an aircraft must have been built exactly in accordance with the equivalent SLSA design and specification. Not so for an E-AB. Therefore, an ELSA RV-12 will throretically meet the same performance, safety, and reliability standards as an SLSA RV-12. The same cannot necessarily be said of the E-AB version. Since this particular aircraft has a different engine from the SLSA RV-12, it obviously doesn't meet the same standards, so it can't be an ELSA. That only leaves E-AB, which doesn't provide any assurances as to specs, performance, or reliability.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
- FastEddieB
- Posts: 2880
- Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:33 pm
- Location: Lenoir City, TN/Mineral Bluff, GA
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
I think that’s a bit misleading.drseti wrote:Therefore, an ELSA RV-12 will throretically meet the same performance, safety, and reliability standards as an SLSA RV-12.
It’s true, but only for one bright, shining moment: that moment the DAR confirms that the plane meets SLSA standards and issues the new Experimental certificate.
After that moment, the owner of an E-LSA has the legal right to modify the plane in any way he or she sees fit, so long as it doesn’t remove it from the definition of an LSA. And once those modifications begin, there’s virtually no assurance that the plane will still have “the same performance, safety, and reliability standards” as it did before the conversion.
Of course, I know you know that, but I just wanted to make it clear.
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
Of course that's true. But, if the plane was built with an entirely different engine, it can't even come close.FastEddieB wrote:once those modifications begin, there’s virtually no assurance that the plane will still have “the same performance, safety, and reliability standards” as it did before the conversion.
The opinions posted are those of one CFI, and do not necessarily represent the FAA or its lawyers.
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Prof H Paul Shuch
PhD CFII DPE LSRM-A/GL/WS/PPC iRMT
AvSport LLC, KLHV
[email protected]
AvSport.org
facebook.com/SportFlying
SportPilotExaminer.US
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
I think the biggest marketability factor here is not the E-AB registration but the engine itself ...
Flying Sting S4 ( N184WA ) out of Illinois
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 11:52 am
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
Asking price has been reduced to $59,900 and the owner is open to offers.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 4:53 pm
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
BEAUTIFUL Aircraft! Would have sold ten times over, had it had a ROTAX.
Re: FS: 2013 VANS RV-12
I wouldn't say that. Was the engine mount and FWF package a Van's option? If so, and the builder followed the instructions for that optional configuration, there's no reason it's any less safe or reliable than the Rotax-powered version built by the same builder. Of course, if the FWF was an aftermarket package, the safety and reliability is highly dependent on the quality of the engineering that went into them.drseti wrote:Of course that's true. But, if the plane was built with an entirely different engine, it can't even come close.FastEddieB wrote:once those modifications begin, there’s virtually no assurance that the plane will still have “the same performance, safety, and reliability standards” as it did before the conversion.
But anyway, you are also trusting the engineering department at Van's as much as the builder. They can make mistakes too as much as any aftermarket company, as seen by the tail AD and fuel tank revisions in the RV-12.
Andy Walker
Athens, GA
Sport Pilot ASEL, LSRI
2007 Flight Design CTSW E-LSA
Athens, GA
Sport Pilot ASEL, LSRI
2007 Flight Design CTSW E-LSA