Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Constructive topics of interest related to aviation that do not match the other section descriptions below (as long as it is somewhat related to aviation, flying, learning to fly, sport pilot, light sport aircraft, etc.). Please, advertisements for Viagra will be promptly deleted!"

Moderator: drseti

User avatar
dstclair
Posts: 1092
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2008 11:23 am
Location: Allen, TX

Re: Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Post by dstclair »

The Cessna Skycatcher was ended due to a change in direction of the executive leadership team. Jack Pelton was a firm believer in the vertical market that started with training pilots in their product. The Skycatcher was targeted at this market and built up a very substantial order list. Once Pelton was forced out, the direction of the Skycatcher was uncertain until it culminated with the new CEO stating the Skycatcher had no future. I view this as more of P/L decision than a comment on the plane itself. I'd venture a guess that the profit on one bizjet exceeded the entire profitability of Skycatcher line. Direct ROI may not have ever made sense. The market for LSA is really small when compared Textron's other business units so even if Cessna owned the ENTIRE market, it may not have had the profitability Textron was looking for. Perhaps, the low-end GA market is best served by smaller companies where the opportunity is large for them.
dave
Jack Tyler
Posts: 1380
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Prescott AZ
Contact:

Re: Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Post by Jack Tyler »

Dave's quite right about the fateful final days of the Skycatcher. The new CEO was from GE - as were several senior managers he brought in after him - and they are all about bottom line numbers. But the initial problems were very different. They had lost some of their light a/c design talent after the drop off in piston a/c sales, couldn't justify replenishing it, and so produced several iterations of a poor design that led to delays. Remember the crashes? Next, the costing rate for an hour's labor at Cessna was not competitive so they decided to manufacture offshore, a decision for which they had very limited experience, with only final assembly in the U.S. That added unanticipated cost and significant delivery delays. Add in the fact that the European competition had its roots in glider design and construction, where weight is the enemy, and Cessna simply wasn't well equipped, by culture and skill sets, to be successful.
Jack
Flying in/out KBZN, Bozeman MT in a Grumman Tiger
Do you fly for recreational purposes? Please visit http://www.theraf.org
Cluemeister
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 8:20 pm

Re: Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Post by Cluemeister »

So you're saying other than labor costs, design, a totally new boss at the helm, and intense competition, they were this close!
HAPPYDAN
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 11:49 am

Re: Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Post by HAPPYDAN »

Our (user to be) local Cessna dealer agrees that it was economics that killed the project. Production costs were higher than anticipated, and keeping it priced competitively rendered the plane unprofitable. In my personal opinion, it is a solid trainer and fun recreational plane, that's easy to control, with a nice power to weight ratio (has come in handy once or twice!). BUT - 2 adults with weekend baggage and full fuel tanks can put it seriously overweight.
Cluemeister
Posts: 329
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2015 8:20 pm

Re: Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Post by Cluemeister »

I agree Happy. Flocker was kind enough to take me up in his rental Skycatcher this weekend. Great little plane!
SportPilot
Posts: 1060
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 3:39 pm

Re: Dealer Network vs. Factory Direct Sales

Post by SportPilot »

.......
Post Reply