| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
flyboyjim
Joined: 27 Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Location: Northport, NY
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:02 pm Post subject: Rotax 914 Engine |
|
|
I see that Rotax has come out with a Turbo charged version of the 912 - the 914 which raises the HP from 100 to 115. It looks like the same displacement and probably the same engine mounting.
Other than the cost, is there any reason why the 914 should not be considered as an option for the new breed of LSA. Does is comply with the new rule (naturally aspirated).
Looks like it is 40lb heavier but would provide great power at altitude. A nice trade. :roll: |
|
| Back to top |
|
vwvectors
Joined: 12 Aug 2006
Posts: 76
Location: Florida
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The 914 requires the use of a constant speed prop which under the LSA rules only ground adjustable props are allowed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
owenstrawn
Joined: 02 Jul 2006
Posts: 20
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
40 lbs is a lot of weight on a 1320 lb airplane.
Nearly 7 gallons of fuel
120 miles range
90% of baggage allowance
7-10% of the total useful load.
A LOT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
jlong16
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 96
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 11:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| The 914 doesn't really seem to perform all that well in higher humidity. I am not a mechanic and have only typed something a mechanic told me, once, when I inquired about buying one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chuckhhill
Joined: 09 Jul 2007
Posts: 28
Location: Concord, CA
|
| Posted: Thu Jan 31, 2008 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 914 has a lower TBO than the 912, 1200 hours vice 1500. It is the same displacement as the smaller 80 HP Rotax 912.
Also S-LSA rules require that an airplane with a 115 HP have a higher useful load than one with only 100. Jabiru with their 120 HP engine, but it might be problematic for some aircraft. Don't know if that is an issue for E-SLAs.
At the Sebring Expo, Liberty had a prototype certified aircraft that had the 914. They said it had better high altitude performance than the O-235 they normally use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jeff Tipton
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Magni Gyrocopters use a fixed pitch prop on there 914's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
rfane
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 80
Location: San Jose, CA
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Why would you need a turbocharged engine on a gyrocopter? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jeff Tipton
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 73
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The way the Magni is setup it only uses 100 horsepower normally and if you go around the horn on the throttle you will have the full 115 horsepower.
The advantage of the turbo is full horsepower up to the critical altitude of around 10,000 feet. I don't recall the exact altitude. The other nice thing is the computer takes care of the work for you. You don't really need a manifold pressure gauge. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |